Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twitter. Show all posts

Friday, January 3, 2014

Predictions for 2014, off the top and some over

Predictions for the new year cover a variety of topics including healthcare, landlines, rainfall, blogging and publishing.

  1. Consumers will continue to debate whether there should be ads on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, etc., then sigh with relief that phone solicitors no longer call because they disconnected their landlines.
  2. Just when you think landlines have completely disappeared, the new version will include a 22nd century version of the home intercom with screens for Skype like communications room to room, or room to smartphone, that revert to security monitors that can be tapped anywhere the user has internet access such as the office or on vacation.
  3. During 2014, there will be a resurgence of blogging as self-published authors seek to develop an audience for their self-published books. Blog posts will be posted in all social media venues until the noise level reaches ringing in the ear level.
  4. Self-published authors will continue to rise while a sub-industry quickly develops to assist the reading audience vet the muck from the ready-for-print-fully-edited tomes.
  5. 2014 will continue to be the year that healthcare is debated. Audience fatigue will set in sometime mid-year, and by the time school is back in fall session the bulk of the audience will have tuned out, except for those desperate for care who won't understand why it doesn't matter to everyone else anymore.
  6. Christmas card sending will experience a resurgence, despite the reticence of 360 Convos to embrace the movement.
  7. Workers will investigate how to send drones to the office to do the work and collect their paychecks.
  8. Rainfall in the Northwest will reach record lows, as the global warming debate rages on.
  9. During the year 2014, no one will invent ear buds (inexpensive) that do not fall apart after six uses.
  10. No one will want to see a repeat performance of Miley Cyrus' 2013. 

What do you predict?

    Monday, December 30, 2013

    My Top Tweets of 2013

    End of the year brings a fascination with lists. Here's my top 10 tweets. At the end is a link to a video montage of my Twitter year, and a way for you to make a video, too. Cheers!

    1. Last day of Willamette Writers. Feeling nostalgic (@ Sheraton Portland Airport Hotel - )
    2. What is value of college degree if most of what is learned is outdated by graduation? via |
    3. Whaaaat?? you're not on the air today? I think that calls for a meetup!
    4. Saturday with on her latest NO SUBSTITUTE FOR MONEY. Can't wait to get my hands on the book (I'm in it)
    5. How to clean a Fountain Pen Feed and Nib (secret weapon at :58) / cc
    6. Appreciated the thoughtfulness of 's thank you notes this morning
    7. Somehow this reminded me of RT : Editor, on courtesy titles: “Well, I would like to be referred to as Your Majesty.”
    8. How's your media mix? Half of all ads will be digital by 2018, says Google business chief

    Tuesday, September 13, 2011

    How many times should you tweet a blog post?

    Twitter is a revolving door of social experiments
    One of the things that blogging daily has created is a heightened interest in analytics. I have a couple of different measures on the blog, so I can get a good feel for what is happening with the 360 Convos audience. I've also done a little experimenting to see what combination, for instance of tweets, seems to work best in announcing a new post and building an audience.

    Mark Suster wrote about how many times the experts were tweeting after he sat on a panel with Guy Kawasaki. His post, Both Sides of the Table, reports that Kawasaki tweets a blog post four times.

    Up until a few months ago, I'd been tweeting a link twice—as soon as I post, and then letting the automatic feed release it a second time.

    More recently, I began to notice that I personally didn't pay attention to others who tweeted only once and disappeared. As I flipped through my stream it wasn't enough to make me pause. I did, however, notice when the same avatar showed up in my stream in a clump, meaning the person was tweeting several things in a row.

    Currently, I follow about 1000 people on Twitter and have that and about a third more following me as @TheClassicCarol. My experience shows that tweeting a blog post just once has a low affect on drawing a reading audience.

    Not everyone sees every tweet. Not everyone is on Twitter all the time, therefore you need to send info out at different times during the day.

    That's more anecdotal than research, but it gave me a place to start, and I began tweeting in groups of three. Not always the same blogpost, but three things from the blog.

    Was this smart? Let's look at what 9,000 other bloggers are doing.

    Problogger has been running a poll since May 19, 2010. Their results from over 9,000 respondents show:
    26% never tweet their blog post
    33% tweet their blog post once
    40% tweet their blog post two times or more times

    Of the 40%, the highest portion of that comes from those who tweet a blog post five or more times. That puts them in the Kawasaki category.

    The 360 Convos experience shows that three will generate a higher response to the blog than a one-time shot. It has created more conversation and retweets from followers which has had a positive effect on my KLOUT score. I noticed an increase of over 10 points.

    Has the multiple tweets annoyed the audience? I've seen no visible difference in the unfollow rate. The outcome I do see follows a standard principal in marketing, you need to send the message out more than once, or as I like to say, "one ad does not a campaign make."

    When has a tweet series produced a measurable outcome for you?


    Wednesday, August 24, 2011

    How blogging is like throwing stones

    Blogging is like throwing stones into a calm lake
    The beginning of any journey holds the promise of surprises at each opportunity. I plunged into the lake of my journey to prove a point, that blogging everyday is like throwing a pebble in the big pond. The dropping stone creates not only a momentary splash, but like the ripple of sound waves, it rolls and swells and broadcasts its influence over what has previously been a calm surface.

    The first stones I dropped were boulders. These were stories too big, too large, the pile of words rocking the boat of what I could easily manage. Then, after the big rocks, I tossed smaller ones, easy cute as a kitten fishing for goldfish sized posts that were short. Succinct. Something interesting or fun I found online that I would normally simply tweet, but instead of turning to Twitter, I married it with a couple of paragraphs of thought and published it. Nothing wrong with that. I was learning craft.

    I was learning the ebb and flow of words and the time I had available.

    During my consecutive blogging stint, I found the lake of concepts overstocked with ideas. They were swimming everywhere. You couldn't miss them. I cast my line of opinion into the lake, hooked a few ideas, and reeled them in. If you can fish online, you can blog. If you can stay awake for an hour before bed, you can blog.

    The sweet spot for a blog post is about 500 words.The 500 word vessel is easily managed within the time allotted, it's easy to edit and easy to correct after you post it and discover, for some unknown reason, you have written a smattering of sentences that make absolutely no sense.

    Sometimes to make sense of it, you need to tear it apart.

    Taking one blog post and breaking it up is a great option to get the most mileage out of an idea.The post I'm writing now, was originally planned as one post. I couldn't balance all the boulders and pebbles and row across the lake, the ocean of concepts too wide, the pool of thought too deep. So I drained ideas from the first post. I bailed ideas out of the second post. I siphoned words from the third and managed a series of four. No five. Who's counting? Probably only me.

    I felt ridiculously proud of my accomplishment.

    I wanted to find other people paddling in the blog lake and revel in our accomplishments. I searched nearby.  Dale Chumbley, a Realtor® from Washington State, made a name for himself by posting EVERYDAY for a year. His topic was 365 Things to do in Vancouver, Washington

    To uncover others, I posted a question on Quora and got this response. “You can follow the blog entries done by this man - who visited 1000 bars in 1 year (go to year 2005 and read all about it). http://thousandbars.blogs. He blogged continuously!” said Faisal Khan.

    Really? Blogged about bars? Since 2005? What would you say after the first five years? “I need elbow grease and a beer. Woot. I discovered bag balm and can now raise a glass to any occasion. Bring on the new year.”

    I discovered dooce.com. Since February 2001, Heather B. Armstrong has published more than 6,000 entries. Her claim to fame is...weird. Her blog tags include: Boobs, depression, and therapy. She also wrote the book, It Sucked and Then I Cried: How I Had a Baby, a Breakdown, and a Much Needed Margarita

    Hmm, I thought, maybe I should blog for 365 days. Maybe I should dooce it and go for the thousands.

    I checked my temperature thinking I might be ill.

    No, I realized I was insane.

    Finish the thirty, revel in it, I encouraged myself. The beauty of the journey will be the journey.

    I threw a few more stones in the lake and threw up a few more blog posts and experienced the ripple affect. It's incredible.


    If you'd like to read the other posts in the blogging series, try these:

    What I learned from Jeremiah Owyang
    that allowed me to take down Google*
    *Almost


    Tips for blogging everyday

    Great is the enemy of good and other
    things I learned from blogging


    How blogging is like throwing stones
    How blogging for 30 days in a row
    leads to international acclaim


    'Dale Chumbley' it. What I learned
    blogging everyday

    Thursday, August 4, 2011

    The Flipside of the news

    We flipped the news over to understand the whole story. Here's how we interpreted it.

    News Item: 56% of Americans Check Online News Daily.
    The Flipside: the remainder, or 44% of Americans, check Groupon and are exposed to name-calling; Groupon users 'stingy' say participating merchants.

    News ItemDirect mail program for the post office targets advertising clients of newspapers. (FYI, newspapers are the post office's biggest clients).
    The Flipside: Newspapers threaten to use online payment programs for subscriptions instead of mailing bills. Wait. Who has a subscription to the newspaper? Okay, newspapers threaten to switch  TMC products from direct mail to porch delivery.

    News ItemAmerican Express hires advertising exec from Google to promote luxury online private sales.
    The Flipside: the rest of America checks Groupon.

    News ItemTwitter pushes ads into the timeline...again
    The Flipside Prediction: Number of fans for participating companies plummet as Twitter users unfollow them to get away from the featured ads, but look for discounts on Groupon.

    News ItemNewspaper that never made money closes.
    The Flipside: Laid off workers are told they can apply for jobs at newspaper that almost makes money, should they ever open up (info from same link).

    News ItemLos Angeles Times decides to lay off more workers, but before they could call them in, some begged to go.
    The Flipside: "They were in talks with senior executives to decide whom to cut, some staffers offered to leave." (Info from same link).

    News ItemYahoo Exchange Adds Publisher Real Time Basis Tools
    The Flipside Prediction: In order to control advertising quality, publishers spend too much time deciding what inventory to sell to which buyer at what price, and overall site content slips.




    Sunday, July 31, 2011

    Confessions of a social media strategist

    I have taken two different tactics in practicing social media. One is to pursue connections and the other is more organic, allowing connections to find me and after they do, following an established a set of criteria to determine if they truly want a conversation with me or uncover if they are just trying to boost their numbers.

    I am more curious about what makes people want to click my 'follow' button, so I enjoy the observation mode more than the pursuit, but you can learn from both.

    For my personal research, I have two Twitter accounts. One is focused on writing and publishing connections. I have used that account to see if I can drive the follower count with various tactics that do not require purchasing followers or purchasing advertising. The answer is yes. It works best when you work in conjunction with a second party. I'll probably teach a class on this, so I won't release all my conclusions. The short path is to find someone with an average follower count (not a celebrity), follow the people they most interact with and create conversations.

    The second account began as a way to test how the work environment could take advantage of Twitter and watch those interactions develop. That Twitter account grew into a something much bigger. That one is my observation account.

    It is time to come clean.

    There is one place I apply no science.

    It's LinkedIn.

    Pre-dive bombing into social media, I had received various emails from people stating, "I'd like to add you to my professional network." That just sounded like the dumbest thing I'd ever heard. Most of the invitations came from people I either did not want further connections with, or they were so far a strewn from my daily business interactions I had no idea what would be gained.

    When I finally joined LinkedIN it was more of a surrender to the media. Someone from work helped me understand the statistics portion of LinkedIn and unfortunately (for me), I noticed that they had better stats then I did. My competitive nature kicked in (former salesperson) and I began a pursuit to improve my numbers. As soon as I beat the co-workers stats I found someone else to beat. Once I beat his stats, I was hooked. My circle of trusted professionals leapt past 500,000 and closed in on a million.

    Be still my ego.

    As I watched the ticker rachet up I wondered how many people in my master database are actually on LinkedIn. In an attempt to find I out, I uploaded a vast list into the system. Instead of being able to review who's in the LinkedIn database, I was directed another direction. I hit the button that sent a behemoth pile of LinkedIN invitations out.

    I hopped and jittered all over the keyboard attempting to go back, to log-out, to somehow undo what I had done: intiated a bagillion annoying LinkedIn invitations to people who barely knew me. Bestselling authors, people at my daughter's school, emergency contacts from the neighborhood, people from boards I serve on, and an ex-employee I would have had to of fired if they hadn't quit all received, "I'd like to add you to my professional network."

    That created a personal and public relations nightmare. If too many people click, "I've never heard of her," LinkedIn would determine that I was a spammer and would cut me off. I would lose the option to send invitations to anyone. How to stop this? Perhaps a follow-up email. How do you think you would have reacted to my proposed email?

    "I'm sooooo sorry, I didn't mean to send you a LinkedIn invitation, please ignore."

    After careful consideration, I decided it would confirm I was an idiot or disclose that I didn't really value their association.

    What to do?

    I decided to ride it out and accept my fate.

    The emails began trickling in, picked up steam and my stats grew. Currently, my group of trusted professionals sits at 5.2 million.

    What's new in your social community?

    Carol Doane on LinkedIN
    Carol Doane on Twitter
    Carol Doane on Facebook